Free sample essays, free research papers, example term papers, research proposals and dissertations. Sunday, April 1, Essay on Consequentialism Essay on Consequentialism Consequentialism is referred to as the moral theory that says that the consequences of the particular action are the basis for any judgment regarding the mentioned action. It implies that the action, which is right from the moral standpoint, produces a good result. Consequentialism is close by meaning, but still differs from deontology, which evaluates wrongness or rightness of the action regarding of the actually actions character and not its outcome, virtue ethics, that is totally focused upon the person or the agent that performs the action, and not the action or its consequences itself Cumminskey,
Consequentialism Consequentialism Consequentialism is a philosophical state, which suggests that actions are taken for their good consequences. A good illustration is whereby the main aim of being morally right is to make people happier and suffer less, to make room for liberty and to support the continued existence of people.
According to this example, it is evident that the consequence is all that is important, no matter what it is. It is the end that matters, and not how it is arrived at.
This however has been challenged, by the fact that by applying consequentialism, there is a possibility of producing results that are shoddier than when any other ethical theory has been applied.
This essay therefore is all about how to make decisions on the actions to take and not deciding what to do. It brings out three types of consequentialism namely; act, rule and global consequentialism.
This has developed to be the gauge over which opposing moral theories are weighed against each other. Generally, it is based on the principle that: It can as well be considered as a concern for the future, which happens after the action, has been done, irrespective of the means.
Another different interpretation is where even the past events are put into consideration. Some arguable matters arise when discussing consequentialism. On the contrary, the probabilists believe that it is about the potential consequences in proportion to the probability that they are going to happen.
The actualist view is what is usually employed in most cases. This view considers the properness of each action on the foundation of what there outcome is, according to the current state of affairs.
It only takes into consideration that action, which precedes the best outcomes. This is not applicable in most of the real situations.
The best explanation should be that which explains the rightness of an action in a descriptive and more elaborate way. It should be able to explain the action itself. This brings out an issue of continuous ignorance, regarding the correct actions to take.
Therefore, it leads to poor decision-making criterion, which is the basis of taking wrong actions. Consequentialists however defend themselves from these criticisms by stating that their actions are never determined by their principle of correctness.
They instead say that they are driven by some other guidelines from which they get the information that will determine their actions. Mills supports this axiom by this statement: This therefore defends the act-consequentialism, since it shows the existence of several assessment procedures useful in determining the outcome of the action.
The correctness of an action is not determined by the outcome itself, but by the consequences of regulations expecting all other people to act the same way when in similar situation. It is all about following a laid set of rules to achieve a given outcome.
Regardless of this doubt, the rule consequentialism remains the most reliable method of making decisions on the actions to be taken.Apr 03, · Essay on Consequentialism Consequentialism is referred to as the moral theory that says that the consequences of the particular action are the basis for any judgment regarding the mentioned action.
It implies that the action, which is right from the moral standpoint, produces a good result. Consequentialism, also referred to as utilitarianism, seems simple enough to understand as the word “consequence” is evident.
Consequentialist ethics refers to the idea that the correct moral response is always going to be related to the outcome, or consequence, of the act.
In other words, the theory of consequentialism does not adequately deal with aspects of legal and criminal practice, such as fault, and this example therefore confirms the main thesis of this essay: that consequentialism has flaws as an ethical and moral philosophy in terms of legal and criminal justice practice.
The above example serves to illustrate that consequentialism as a theory applied to criminal justice, has certain inescapable flaws in terms of ethics and morality. The aspect of partiality is also another more technical objection to the validity of this stance.
Consequentialism. Consequentialism. Consequentialism is a philosophical state, which suggests that actions are taken for their good consequences.
A good illustration is whereby the main aim of being morally right is to make people happier and suffer less, to make room for liberty and to support the continued existence of people.
Consequentialism does not stand alone, but is comprised of multiple theories that also concentrate on analyzing the most morally acceptable choices to make when encountered with a moral dilemma.
The three components of consequentialist ethics are utilitarianism, ethical altruism, and ethical egoism.